NNOPANICNEWS
PUBLISHING PRINCIPLES

Editorial standards

How NoPanicNews selects, organizes and attributes coverage while preserving a clear line between source reporting and automated indexing.

01

Source selection

Sources are reviewed for public reputation, transparent ownership, reliable RSS delivery, clear attribution and a history of original reporting. Inclusion does not imply endorsement. Feeds may be paused or removed when they become unreliable, misleading or unsafe.

02

Attribution and summaries

Every indexed item identifies the publisher and links to the original report. NoPanicNews does not republish full articles. Short descriptions are derived from publisher-provided RSS metadata and are clearly presented as a discovery layer.

03

Grouping and automation

Similar headlines may be grouped using automated text comparison. A grouping is not a factual verdict and can contain mistakes. Readers should compare the linked publishers and consult official sources for consequential decisions.

04

Corrections and removals

Factual, attribution, copyright and grouping concerns are reviewed promptly. Requests should identify the affected URL, describe the issue and include supporting evidence. Valid corrections are applied without charging the requester.

05

Independence and conflicts

Source ranking is not sold. Advertising or future commercial relationships will not grant editorial control over inclusion, grouping or corrections. Material sponsorships will be labeled when introduced.